P. v. Mendoza CA6
Audencio Rosas Mendoza was convicted by jury of forcible lewd acts on a child under 14 and annoying and molesting a child under 18. On appeal, he contends that the trial court prejudicially erred by limiting the scope of the defense case and argument, admitting expert testimony on the child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome (CSAAS), misinstructing the jury on the permissible use of CSAAS evidence, and permitting rebuttal evidence to d
Comments on P. v. Mendoza CA6