P. v. King CA2/3
‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ Appellant Aundra Lionell King appeals his conviction for grand theft. King challenges the sufficiency of evidence to support the grand theft conviction, the admissibility of witness testimony regarding the value of the stolen items, and the failure to instruct on the value of the stolen items. He also claims cumulative error. We reject King’s claims and affirm the

Comments on P. v. King CA2/3

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced