Merchant Capital Source v. Salwan CA4/3
Defendant Ripudaman Salwan challenges the denial of his motions to (1) vacate a default judgment against him, and (2) quash postjudment subpoenas and a writ of execution. Because the trial court correctly ruled that there was no basis to vacate the judgment or interfere with the enforcement efforts, we affirm.

Comments on Merchant Capital Source v. Salwan CA4/3

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced