In re D.G. CA3
Appellant M.M. (mother) appeals from the juvenile court’s 18-month status review hearing orders that terminated reunification services and did not return David G. and Daniel G. (minors) to mother under Welfare and Institutions Code1 section 366.22. Mother contends insufficient evidence supports the juvenile court’s decision not to return the minors to mother. She further claims the court erred because corporal punishment is not within t
Comments on In re D.G. CA3