Ball v. De Leon CA2/5
Plaintiff and appellant Langston Ball challenges the trial court’s order granting an anti-SLAPP motion to strike his complaint (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16)1 filed by defendant and respondent Heidi Sue De Leon. Plaintiff limits his argument to step one of the anti-SLAPP analysis, i.e., the requirement that defendant establish the allegations in the complaint arise from protected conduct. In this regard, he claims the trial court
Comments on Ball v. De Leon CA2/5