In re S.L. CA1/3
D.L. (Father), father of minor S.L., appeals the juvenile court’s order denying his motion to terminate dependency jurisdiction. He contends the court erred in continuing jurisdiction under a family maintenance plan because he successfully ameliorated the conditions that led to the initial assumption of jurisdiction. We conclude the court did not abuse its discretion in continuing jurisdiction due to concerns with Father’s failure to fu
Comments on In re S.L. CA1/3