J.M. v. M.M. CA3
Self-represented M.M. (husband) appeals from the family court’s order granting a three-year domestic violence restraining order against him. He contends: (1) the order lacks supporting substantial evidence; (2) the family court violated his due process rights; (3) the family court failed to conduct certain mandatory statutory analyses; and (4) the family court demonstrated judicial bias. We disagree and affirm. Undesignated statutory re
Comments on J.M. v. M.M. CA3