Tripathi v. Tesconi CA1/3
Defendant Raymond Tesconi appeals from the trial court’s order granting plaintiff Ashish Tripathi’s unopposed motion for summary judgment. Tesconi argues the shortened briefing schedule prevented him from opposing the motion, and Tripathi failed to establish the required elements for his unlawful detainer claim. Tesconi further contends the court erred in denying his motion for a stay of the dispute while his wrongful foreclosure civil
Comments on Tripathi v. Tesconi CA1/3