In re David T. CA2/8
Mother D.L. (Mother) appeals the termination of her parental rights over her son David T. She argues that the trial court erred when it did not appoint a guardian ad litem (GAL) for her sua sponte. She contends the error was not harmless because a GAL would have argued more effectively on her behalf than her counsel did. We conclude that if the trial court erred, the error was harmless. We affirm the termination of parental rights.
Comments on In re David T. CA2/8