P. v. Cruz-Araujo CA4/3
Defendant Nicolas David Cruz-Araujo challenges his sex-crime convictions, contending the trial court erred by admitting his un-Mirandized1 confession. The court concluded defendant’s interrogation was not custodial and thus did not require Miranda warnings. We conclude defendant confessed during a custodial interrogation. Thus, the failure to advise him of his Miranda rights required the court to suppress his confession. Because we cann
Comments on P. v. Cruz-Araujo CA4/3