Barstol v. County of Orange CA4/3
Plaintiffs1 appeal from a judgment entered after the trial court sustained a demurrer without leave to amend. Plaintiffs contend their proposed third amended complaint sufficiently alleges Bane Act violations, the continuing violations doctrine rendered their claims timely, and the trial judge should have been disqualified. We hold the Bane Act does not support their claims, the continuing violations doctrine does not excuse their inade
Comments on Barstol v. County of Orange CA4/3