Medina v. Medina CA4/3
Plaintiff Porfirio Medina appeals from an order denying his request for elder abuse protective orders against his children, Veronica Medina and Ezequiel Medina.1 He contends the trial court wrongly found none of the children’s conduct at their shared house constituted elder abuse. But the court found him “particularly not credible” and the children offered explanations and context contradicting Porfirio. Deferring to the court’s
Comments on Medina v. Medina CA4/3