P. v. Urbina-Martinez CA4/3
Defendant Armando Andrei Urbina-Martinez appeals from his conviction for second degree murder on two grounds. First, he contends there was insufficient evidence of either express or implied malice; the evidence instead showed he acted in self-defense. Second, he asserts the jury was misinstructed on implied malice because the instruction omitted a recent amendment clarifying the term “dangerous to human life.” We conclude substantial ev
Comments on P. v. Urbina-Martinez CA4/3