In re A.V. CA2/1
Appellant-mother D.H. contends the juvenile court erred in issuing its jurisdictional and dispositional orders because it did so without first determining whether it had jurisdiction over her daughter A.V. (born June 2020) under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA, codified in California at Family Code section 3400, et seq.). We agree and conditionally vacate the court’s orders.
Comments on In re A.V. CA2/1