8e6 Corp. v. Max CA2/1
David Max, a former shareholder in respondent 8e6 Corp. (8e6), and Ralph Rogari, Max’s counsel, appeal an order denying their request seeking attorney fees from 8e6 and several 8e6 agents (the fiduciaries).1 The request sought fees associated with Max’s and Rogari’s respective anti-SLAPP motions to strike 8e6 and the fiduciaries’ malicious prosecution action. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16.)2 The anti-SLAPP motions became moot when 8e6
Comments on 8e6 Corp. v. Max CA2/1