In re Dixon CA1/4
(Chapman v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 18.) We conclude that the jury was not properly instructed on the kill zone theory but that the error was not prejudicial. Accordingly, we deny the petition. In January 2012, Dixon was convicted of assault with a firearm on Samuel King (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(2)) (count 1); first-degree murder of
Comments on In re Dixon CA1/4