P. v. Adamyan CA2/8
INTRODUCTION Appellant Gagik Adamyan asked for mental health diversion after being charged with shooting at an inhabited dwelling in violation of Penal Code1 section 246. There are two issues before us. First, whether substantial evidence supports the trial court’s finding that Adamyan poses an unreasonable risk to public safety and is therefore not a candidate for mental health diversion under section 1001.36; and second, whether the
Comments on P. v. Adamyan CA2/8