P. v. Freisheim CA3
Defendant Charles Devante Freisheim was convicted of multiple domestic violence offenses against his girlfriend. Defendant now appeals, arguing the trial court erred by denying his motion for mental health diversion under Penal Code1 section 1001.36 by finding there was an unreasonable risk he would commit a super strike offense. Defendant also argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel failed to argu
Comments on P. v. Freisheim CA3