P. v. Valenzuela CA6
22, subd. (b)(1)) and his conviction for active participation in a criminal street gang (id., subd. (a)) must be vacated because they are unsupported by the evidence. We agree. When the trial court granted Valenzuela’s petition for resentencing under section 1172.6, his judgment became nonfinal and was subject to the retroactive application of Assembly Bill No. 333. (People v. Trent (2025) 112 Cal.App.5th 251, 262–263 [once petition for
Comments on P. v. Valenzuela CA6