P. v. Hodge CA5
-ooOoo- Defendant Anthony Gene Hodge was convicted by jury of second degree robbery, misdemeanor theft, and misdemeanor resisting a police officer. On appeal, he contends: (1) the trial court’s admission of his statements violated his Miranda rights (Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 (Miranda)); (2) the prosecution committed misconduct during closing argument; (3) the court prejudicially erred by sentencing him to the upper
Comments on P. v. Hodge CA5