P. v. Stine CA3
A jury found defendant Michael Raymond Stine guilty of premeditated murder. On appeal, defendant contends the record provides insufficient support for the jury’s findings he acted with premeditation, a lack of self-defense, a lack of imperfect self‑defense, and a lack of heat of passion. Defendant also asserts several instructional errors, one prosecutorial error, and cumulative error based on these claims. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Stine CA3