P. v. Pantoja CA2/2
Defendant and appellant Oscar Pantoja (defendant) appeals from his conviction of two counts of attempted murder where the People advanced the kill zone theory to support his guilt. Defendant contends use of the kill zone instruction was factually unsupported and should not have been given and the court’s instruction identified a primary target not supported by the evidence; he adds, the prosecutor’s argument compounded these
Comments on P. v. Pantoja CA2/2