legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Sedaghat v. Estrada CA2/2
Soheil Sedaghat (appellant) appeals from the trial court’s order granting respondents City of Los Angeles and Deputy City Attorney Irving Estrada’s (collectively, the city) motion brought pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (section 425.16 or the anti-SLAPP statute). Appellant has failed to provide a statement of facts or procedural history of the case, as required by California Rules of Court, rule 8.204(a)(2). Appellant

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale