legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re L.H. CA1/1
M.H. (the biological father of L.H.) appeals from the termination of his parental rights under Welfare and Institutions Code1 section 366.26—a course of action that respondent San Francisco Human Services Agency (the Agency) had recommended to the juvenile court. According to M.H., the court erred in concluding M.H. had failed to show by a preponderance of the evidence that his son, L.H., “would benefit from continuing the relationship”

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale