P. v. Henderson CA2/1
75. (See § 1172.75, subds. (c), (d).) Henderson consented to the interim striking of the prior prison term enhancement based on the court’s assurance it would later conduct a full resentencing. Tang did not render that assurance meaningless. In that case, an appellate court had stricken the prior prison term enhancement as part of the defendant’s direct appeal. (People v. Tang, supra, 109 Cal.App.5th at p. 1006.) More than a decade late
Comments on P. v. Henderson CA2/1