legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re J.M. CA5
On April 1, 2021, the agency filed a section 300 petition alleging the children were at risk of harm due to a bruise on J.M., age eight, inflicted non-accidentally by mother and a bite mark on M.L., age five, inflicted non-accidentally by Martin L., alleged father of M.L. and B.L., age two. J.M.’s father was listed as unknown. The petition alleged further that mother and Martin L. had substance abuse issues and that their whereabouts were unknown.
In “Indian Child Inquiry Attachment” documents (ICWA-010(A)) attached to the petition, the agency indicated the interviews with mother and Martin L. on March 12, 2021, gave it no reason to believe the children might be Indian children.
Detention
In its detention report of April 2, 2021, the agency indicated that both mother and Martin L. denied any Native American ancestry. In an ICWA-020 form filed April 2, 2021, Martin L. stated he had no Indian ancestry, as far as he knew.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale