legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Williams CA4/15
In this appeal, defendant Nicholas Earl Williams argues that the trial court violated the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution and article I, section 17 of the California Constitution by imposing and staying for 120 days various fines and fees when defendant was put on formal probation, while simultaneously determining that defendant did not have the present ability to pay under People v. Dueñas (2019) 30 Cal.App.5th 1157 (Dueñas). We affirm because defendant does not establish on appeal that the fines and fees were unconstitutionally excessive, but we find that a limited remand is appropriate to correct certain errors in the trial court’s sentencing minute order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale