Etame v. Ermel 2/9
Wolfram Ermel appeals from the denial of his motion to vacate the default judgment entered against him. We dismiss Ermel’s appeal because it is untimely. Moreover, Ermel has failed to specify any grounds entitling him to relief.

Comments on Etame v. Ermel 2/9

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced