P. v. Davila CA4/3
Rigoberto Villagrana Davila appeals from a judgment after the jury convicted him of numerous sexual offenses. Davila asserts the prosecution’s theory of duress was not supported by substantial evidence. We disagree and affirm the judgment.

Comments on P. v. Davila CA4/3

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced