In re S.W. CA2/3
Father I.V. appeals from the termination of his parental rights to his son, S.W. He contends the juvenile court erred when it did not apply the relative caregiver exception to the termination of parental rights under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(A) and identify legal guardianship by S.W.’s maternal grandmother in Washington state as S.W.’s permanent plan. Substantial evidence that the maternal grandmother―the relative caregiver―was willing to adopt S.W. supports the court’s finding that the relative caregiver exception did not apply. We therefore affirm the judgment.
Comments on In re S.W. CA2/3