Sling Technologies, Inc. v. iNet, Inc. CA2/6
Sling Technologies, Inc. appeals an order disqualifying its counsel, Eric Woosley and the Law Offices of Woosley & Porter (collectively Woosley) from representing it in this case and the related arbitration. Sling contends the disqualification order is an abuse of discretion because it contains no factual findings; that Woosley did not previously represent Sling’s adversary iNet, Inc., doing business as iParq (iParq); that there is no substantial relationship between this matter and a prior matter in which Woosley represented a different entity, iParq LLC (the LLC); and that Woosley did not obtain any material confidential information from the LLC in the prior matter. We affirm.
Comments on Sling Technologies, Inc. v. iNet, Inc. CA2/6