P. v. Khan CA1/2
Defendants Mohammed Khan and Manuel Trujillo were convicted by a jury of first degree murder and attempted voluntary manslaughter. Khan was also convicted of cultivation of marijuana, and an arming enhancement was found true as to Trujillo. Trujillo and Kahn both appeal, Trujillo making three fundamental arguments in which Khan joins: (1) instructional error; (2) insufficiency of evidence in three particulars; and (3) double jeopardy. Khan makes an additional argument, insufficiency of evidence as to the conviction for attempted voluntary manslaughter. We conclude that none of the arguments has merit, and we affirm.
Comments on P. v. Khan CA1/2