In re G.B. CA2/1
C.B. (Father), appeals from the dependency court’s jurisdictional and dispositional orders relating to Father’s 12 year old son, G.B. He also challenges the permanent restraining order that enjoined him from certain conduct with respect to G.B., G.B.’s mother (Mother), and Mother’s husband, and challenges the exit order that granted Mother sole custody of G.B. Specifically, Father contends that insufficient evidence supported the jurisdictional findings against him; that the court denied him due process in conducting the adjudication proceedings and issuing a restraining order; that the court erred in dismissing the allegation that Mother emotionally abused G.B., and in failing to require the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) to facilitate his visitation with G.B. DCFS filed a cross-appeal complaining that the court referred to the wrong statute when it terminated jurisdiction. As we explain, the parties’ contentions lack merit or are moot. Accordingly, we
Comments on In re G.B. CA2/1