legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Medina v. Costco Wholesale Corp. CA4/2
Plaintiff and appellant Martha Medina appeals after a jury trial where the jury found in favor of defendant and respondent Costco Wholesale Corporation (Costco). Medina sued Costco based on negligence and premises liability causes of action claiming she slipped and fell on something slippery and wet outside Costco’s warehouse in Rancho Cucamonga (the Warehouse), injuring herself. Medina sought to call Brad Avrit as an expert witness to testify that shopping carts and shoes tracked contaminants such as oil and dust from the parking lot to the area where she fell and caused her to slip and fall.
Costco brought its “Motion in Limine For Order Limiting Trial Testimony [of] Plaintiff’s Retained Expert Brad Avrit” (MIL) prior to trial, seeking to exclude the testimony because it was based on speculation and was not a proper subject of expert testimony. The trial court granted the MIL and the matter proceeded to trial without Avrit’s testimony.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale