legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Omar CA6
A jury convicted defendant Mohammed Omar of possession and transportation for sale of khat, a controlled substance. He argues the trial court erred by admitting statements in violation of his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, and he contends the prosecutor committed prejudicial misconduct in closing argument. He also argues for reversal of the judgment because the record on appeal does not include documents reviewed in camera by the trial court under Pitchess v. Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 531 (Pitchess). Finding no error and also no prejudice from the absent documents, we will affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale