legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Terry S. v. Superior Court CA1/4
In this juvenile writ proceeding, both Ch. M. (mother) and Terry S. (father) seek extraordinary relief from the juvenile court order terminating reunification services and setting a permanency planning hearing pursuant to section 366.26 of the Welfare and Institutions Code with respect to their young son, C.M. Specifically, both parents argue that they were denied reasonable services and/or active efforts to prevent the breakup of their Indian family as mandated by the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq., and state law. Mother additionally asserts that there was insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court’s detriment finding, which blocked return of C.M. to her care.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale