Churches v. Oneto CA3
Plaintiff Rich Churches sued defendants Edward Oneto, Rux Oneto, and Oneto Group, Inc., alleging various claims hinging on his theory that a partnership had been formed, and defendants deprived him of the benefits therefrom. By stipulation, the trial court bifurcated two equitable theories and conducted a court trial, resulting in a detailed statement of decision finding no partnership had ever been created. The trial court reasoned that that conclusion undermined the remaining legal claims, and entered a judgment for defendants, from which plaintiff timely filed this appeal.
Comments on Churches v. Oneto CA3