legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Waiton CA1/4
After a preliminary hearing, Waiton was charged by information with making criminal threats (a felony) and exhibiting a deadly weapon (a misdemeanor) in violation of section 422 and section 417, subdivision (a)(1), respectively. On November 18, 2014, Waiton’s appointed attorney declared a doubt as to Waiton’s competency to stand trial. Waiton made a motion under People v. Marsden (1970) 2 Cal.3d 118 (Marsden) seeking appointment of a different attorney. After an in camera hearing, the trial court granted Waiton’s motion and appointed a second attorney to represent him.
On January 6, 2015, Waiton’s second attorney declared a doubt as to Waiton’s competency to stand trial. Again, Waiton made a Marsden motion. The trial court held another in camera hearing and denied this second Marsden motion. The trial court then, pursuant to section 1368, suspended criminal proceedings and appointed two psychologists to evaluate Waiton’s competency. Waiton refused to speak to eit

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale