In re L.O. CA6
Appellant D.O. (father) seeks review of a juvenile court order terminating his parental rights to his son L.O. under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. On appeal, father contends that the court abused its discretion by selecting adoption as the permanent plan for L.O., because he and the minor enjoyed a beneficial relationship that was not outweighed by the benefits of adoption. We find the court’s decision fully supported by the evidence and within the bounds of its discretion. We will therefore affirm the order.
Comments on In re L.O. CA6