In re R.V. CA4/3
R.V. appeals from a judgment declaring him a ward after the juvenile court found true one count of battery (Pen. Code, § 242; count 1) and one count of vandalism under $400 (§ 594 (a), (b)(2)(A); count 2). R.V. contends the juvenile court erred in calculating his maximum term of confinement because both counts were based upon a single objective. He also argues the probation condition requiring him to act peacefully with victims/witnesses should be reversed because it is vague. We determine R.V.’s maximum term of confinement properly included terms for counts 1 and 2. We agree the probation condition requiring R.V. to have “peaceful contact” with his victims/witnesses should be modified to give R.V. guidance as to the bounds of the proscribed behavior. With the modification, we affirm the judgment in all respects.
Comments on In re R.V. CA4/3