Marriage of P. and Starks CA6
Marreon Gene Starks appeals from the judgment nullifying his marriage to Beatrice P., a conserved person.
On appeal, Starks argues the trial court: (1) erred in denying his oral motion for pendente lite attorney fees under Family Code section 2030; (2) violated his due process rights by entering a judgment of nullity based on racial and/or age discrimination; (3) erred in refusing to permit Beatrice P. to testify at the hearing; and (4) erred in entering a judgment of nullity based on misrepresented facts and legal reasoning pertaining to his prior marriage.
Comments on Marriage of P. and Starks CA6