legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re J.H. CA4/2
D.W. (Mother) and J.H. (Father) have a history of abusing drugs that led to the San Bernardino County Department of Children and Family Services (CFS) removing their children from their home. The parents’ reunification services were terminated as to their two older children, and the children currently reside with their legal guardian. Both parents were denied reunification services as to their then six-month-old daughter J.H. pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 361.5, subdivisions (b)(10), (b)(12), and (b)(13). About four months later they each filed section 388 petitions, which were summarily denied. The parents appeal from the juvenile court’s orders denying their section 388 petitions.
On appeal, both parents argue the juvenile court erred in summarily denying their section 388 petitions without a hearing. We conclude the juvenile court did not err and affirm the orders denying the parents’ section 388 petitions.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale