P. v. Tovpeko CA3
In denying defendant Pavel Tovpeko’s motion to suppress evidence that his blood alcohol level was 0.30 percent, the trial court found that he freely and voluntarily consented to a blood draw despite the arresting police officer’s failure to inform him of the consequences of refusing to consent. We defer to the trial court’s factual findings and agree with its legal conclusion defendant was not subjected to an unreasonable search because he consented to the blood test. We therefore affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Tovpeko CA3