legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Frank
Defendant Anthony Armstrong Frank appeals from a judgment entered after a jury convicted him of two counts of second degree robbery (Pen. Code, §§ 211, 212.5, subd. (c) -counts 1 and 3)[1] and one count of shooting at an occupied motor vehicle (§ 246- count 2). The jury also found true the allegations that defendant personally used a firearm in the commission of the robberies (§ 12022.53, subd. (b)). The trial court sentenced defendant to a total term of 17 years and four months in prison. On appeal, defendant contends: (1) the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence; and (2) there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction of shooting at an occupied motor vehicle.The judgment is affirmed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale