legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re A.S.
This appeal arises out of a juvenile dependency action. The subject of the action below is A.S.,[1] currently 15 years old. The appellant is J.S., A.S.’s father (father).[2]Father appeals from the dispositional order following a hearing pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 361,[3] in which the juvenile court ordered father to participate in a mental health evaluation and recommended treatment. Father contends the order was an unnecessary intrusion into his privacy and was, therefore, an abuse of discretion.
We find no abuse of discretion with respect to the dispositional orders and affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale