In re A.G.
A.S. (Father) has attempted to appeal from jurisdiction and disposition findings made in conjunction with an order setting a Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 hearing to select a permanent plan for his 12-year-old daughter A. S.-G. (A.)[1] Father contends there is insufficient evidence to support some of the juvenile court’s jurisdictional findings and that the court erred by denying him visitation. We will construe Father’s notice of appeal as a petition for extraordinary writ. We reject all of Father’s contentions and deny the petition on the merits.
Comments on In re A.G.