P. v. Lopez
A jury convicted appellant Raul Ramon Lopez of felony vandalism and misdemeanor vandalism. Lopez contends his convictions should be reversed because (1) the trial court abused its discretion when it denied his motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, and (2) defense counsel rendered ineffective assistance when she failed to object to remarks made by the prosecutor in closing argument. We disagree and will affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Lopez