In re I.F.
Y.N. (mother) appeals from the dependency court’s judgment of November 26, 2012, declaring I.F. (son) and I.N. (daughter) dependents of the court under Welfare and Institutions Code section 360.[1] She contends: (1) substantial evidence does not support the sustained allegation that her drug use created a risk of harm to the children; and (2) the court’s failure to obtain her waiver of her trial rights was prejudicial error. We affirm.
Comments on In re I.F.