P. v. Sherman
Elisa Bertha Sherman appeals a judgment following her conviction for possession for sale of a controlled substance‑‑methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378) and transportation of methamphetamine (id., § 11379, subd. (a)). We conclude, among other things, that 1) the trial court did not err by admitting evidence of Sherman's prior convictions; 2) the trial court gave proper guidance to jurors about audio recordings of conversations that were admitted into evidence and a written transcript that contained English translations of Spanish language conversations; and 3) the trial court should have given a sua sponte instruction on an uncharged conspiracy, but the error was harmless. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Sherman