legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Salazar v. George H. Maintenance
In this appeal from an order imposing sanctions (Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.420, subd. (h)),[1] plaintiff and appellant Ana Salazar contends that because the court allowed the deposition of respondent David Lee to be taken, the court denied Lee’s motion for a protective order, which eliminated any basis for sanctions. We conclude, however, that because the court granted Lee’s motion for a protective order, the court was authorized to impose sanctions.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale